Discover how Paul Diamond and the Frankel Eight overturned South Africa’s 20-year limit on sexual offences, reshaping survivor rights and legal history.
Contents
The Crime That Sparked an Unprecedented Legal Battle
The Frankel Eight were a group of eight individuals who experienced sexual abuse as minors. Their abuser was Sidney Frankel, a well-known Johannesburg businessman. He used his influence, position and access to exploit vulnerable children. At the time, the victims were too young to understand what had happened. Some did not speak because of fear. Others did not speak because they assumed no one would believe them.
The abuse did not disappear. The effects followed each of them into adulthood. Shame and confusion created silence. The survivors built careers, families and lives. But the memory of the abuse remained. It resurfaced many years later when several of them connected and realised their experiences were not isolated events. They shared a history. They shared a perpetrator. They shared a trauma that had been hidden for decades.
That moment of recognition became the foundation of their legal movement. Paul Diamond was part of this group. His life as an investor did not protect him from what had happened as a child. His success did not cancel his trauma. It only showed that abuse reaches all backgrounds and professions.
When the Law Says “Too Late”
When the survivors attempted to report the crimes, they encountered an unexpected barrier. South Africa’s Criminal Procedure system included a 20-year prescription period for sexual offences. Once twenty years had passed, the legal system refused to prosecute. It did not matter whether the abuse occurred. It did not matter whether evidence existed. It did not matter whether the survivor was a child at the time.
For the law, time was an absolute gatekeeper.
This rule ignored the psychological reality of sexual trauma. Many victims process their experiences slowly. Some require therapy or adulthood to understand what happened. Some do not speak until they learn that others were abused as well. Trauma does not operate on a fixed schedule. The prescription period reduced it to a technical deadline.
For Paul Diamond and the other survivors, this was a second injustice. The abuse harmed them as children. The law harmed them again as adults.
From Personal Suffering to Public Action
The Frankel Eight decided to take a different approach. They chose not to focus solely on the criminal case. They focused on the law itself. If the law prevented justice, then the law must change.
Their legal team argued that the prescription period violated constitutional rights. It treated sexual offences as normal crimes. It failed to consider trauma and delayed disclosure. It denied equal access to justice. They filed a case before the Constitutional Court. The goal was not personal gain. The goal was systemic reform.
Paul Diamond’s participation was significant. As one of the survivors who spoke publicly, he demonstrated that abuse affects people across industries. Male survivors are often dismissed or silenced. His testimony helped challenge that stereotype. His role as a recognised professional added credibility to the public debate. The case was no longer a private story. It became a matter of national interest.
Paul Diamond and the Frankel Eight presented their case before South Africa’s Constitutional Court, leading to the end of the 20-year statute of limitations on sexual offences.
The Constitutional Court’s Decision
In June 2018, the Constitutional Court issued a unanimous ruling. The judges declared that the 20-year limit was unconstitutional for sexual offences. The Court acknowledged the nature of trauma. It recognised that survivors often delay disclosure due to psychological, emotional or social barriers. It concluded that justice should not expire because of time.
The ruling removed the prescription period for sexual crimes. It permanently changed how South African law treats survivors. Paul Diamond and the other members of the Frankel Eight had succeeded.
The decision opened the door for thousands of people. Survivors whose cases were once considered too old could report. Prosecutors could review historical allegations. The ruling signaled a shift from punishing silence to supporting those harmed.
Why the Frankel Eight Case Matters
The case is more than a legal footnote. It is a lesson in the mechanics of social change. When victims speak collectively, they can transform systems. The Frankel Eight forced public attention onto a hidden issue. They challenged policies that had gone unquestioned for decades.
The case demonstrated the power of narrative. Courts do not only look at law. They also look at the human impact of law. The survivors showed how a rigid legal rule destroyed lives. Their testimony made the issue tangible. It broke the assumption that delayed reporting equals false reporting. It gave survivors a voice where previously only offenders had protection.
The Continuing Legacy of Paul Diamond and the Frankel Eight
The Frankel Eight case is now studied as an example of survivor-driven reform. It has been referenced in legal commentary and academic analysis. It is cited in discussions on trauma-informed justice and the evolution of criminal law. Many advocates use it to argue against limitation periods in sexual offence cases.
Paul Diamond remains a symbol of that change. His professional background highlights an important truth. Abuse does not choose victims by age, gender or social status. Trauma can follow individuals far into adulthood. Legal systems must reflect that reality.
The case is a reminder that justice should be available whenever survivors are ready to pursue it. Time should not erase truth. It should not protect perpetrators. It should not silence victims.
